Dell Adamo vs Apple MacBook Air: configuration, display and connectivity

For a start, each model is available in 2 different configurations as regards performances. When the MacBook Air offers an Intel Core 2 Duo processor (either 1,6 or 1,86 GHz), the Dell Adamo has the same type of processor but with slightly lower rates of 1,2 or 1,4 GHz. As for RAM however, the Adamo gains the upper hand by offering up to 4 GB where the MacBook Air only has 2 GB regardless of the version.

As for storage space, there is also a slight difference with a 128 GB flash SSD for both versions of the Adamo, and a standard 120 GB hard drive or a 128 GB SSD for the MacBook Air. So Dell, left behind in terms of raw performances (processor-wise), catches up with the MacBook Air with better RAM and storage space (4 GB of RAM and 128 GB SSD).

 

 

The MacBook Air has a glossy panoramic 16/10 13,3-inch LCD backlit by LEDs with a resolution of 1280 x 800 pixels. The Dell Adamo is equipped with a 16/9 ultra-flat 13,4-inch LED screen in glass with a resolution of HD 720p. In other words, the screens of both ultraportables have the same technologies and only resolution can make a difference, with a rather hi-def tendency for the Adamo.

 

 

Over the 3 points mentioned (hardware configuration, display and connectivity), these 2 upscale ultraportables are a close match, but for a few details. Though the MacBook Air takes the lead thanks to Core 2 Duo processors which are more powerful, the Dell Adamo catches up with its standard SSD or with the available option for 4 GB of RAM, and even comes first if we are to take into account its built-in HSDPA modem which can be a real advantage for a mobile use.

 

If we are to take into account the connections offered by both models, the clear-cut winner is the Dell Adamo but at the expense of its weight, as it is heavier than the MacBook Air by 0,5 kg, which will exclude it from the ultraportable category by those who value weight over thinness and compactedness of a computer. To conclude, the Dell Adamo, more recent and better equipped, seems more interesting.

Let’s wait for the 2nd round though, which will compare the peripheral devices, the design (weight and size) and most important the price of the 2 competitors, then set up a wrestling match between fans of the Mac OS 10.5 and those of the traditional Windows universe. To be continued very soon.